In re Radcliffe

Full title: IN RE: WILLIAM H. RADCLIFFE, Appellant

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Sep 8, 2017

2017-1069 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 8, 2017)

Opinion

2017-1069

09-08-2017

IN RE: WILLIAM H. RADCLIFFE, Appellant

MATHEW PERRONE, JR., Law Office of Mathew R. P. Perrone, Jr., Algonquin, IL, argued for appellant. AMY J. NELSON, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JEREMIAH HELM.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/804,454.

JUDGMENT

MATHEW PERRONE, JR., Law Office of Mathew R. P. Perrone, Jr., Algonquin, IL, argued for appellant. AMY J. NELSON, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JEREMIAH HELM. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 8, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court