From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1909
66 S.E. 438 (N.C. 1909)

Opinion

(Filed 15 December, 1909.)

Contempt.

In these proceedings for contempt no error is found on appeal after an examination of the evidence and findings of the lower court.

APPEAL from Joseph S. Adams, J., as of February Term, 1909, of McDOWELL.

Hudgins, Watson Johnson and J. Norment Powell for respondents.

No counsel contra.


This is an appeal from the order of his Honor adjudging the above-named respondents in contempt. His Honor imposed a fine of $250 upon the corporation and a fine of $100 each upon the other two respondents. The respondents appealed.


On 6 November, 1908, a restraining order was issued in the case of Hefner v. The Carolina, Clinchfield and Ohio (468) Railway, pending in the Superior Court of McDowell County, enjoining the railway company above named and its agents from using a certain tramway across Hefner's land, as well as from removing certain steel rails laid down upon a tramway over said lands. This injunction was served on 7 November, 1908.

It was for willful disobedience of this order that the proceedings for contempt were instituted before Judge Adams, who was the successor of Judge Murphy as judge of the Fifteenth Judicial District.

We have carefully examined the findings of fact made by his Honor and the evidence introduced upon the hearing before him, and are of opinion that the findings of fact and the judgment of the court are fully warranted. The judgment is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

In re R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1909
66 S.E. 438 (N.C. 1909)
Case details for

In re R. R

Case Details

Full title:IN RE CAROLINA, CLINCHFIELD OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, E. E. HENLEY AND SAMUEL…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 1909

Citations

66 S.E. 438 (N.C. 1909)
151 N.C. 467

Citing Cases

Nobles v. Roberson

The order appointing the receiver was made after due notice to appellant, in a cause then pending in Pitt…

In re T. J. Parker

A party and his agents who wilfully violate a temporary restraining order enjoining (469) the party and his…