From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re R. A. C

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 27, 2009
209 P.3d 426 (Or. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

Nos. 080262038; A138254.

Submitted September 5, 2008.

May 27, 2009.

Appeal from the Multnomah County Circuit Court. Connie L. Isgro, Judge pro tempore.

Liza Langford filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Tiffany Keast, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong, Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.


PER CURIAM

Reversed.


In this civil commitment case, the trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and, because of that disorder, is a danger to herself. On appeal, appellant contends that the record does not contain sufficient evidence to support the order of involuntary commitment. The state concedes the insufficiency of the evidence. Although we are not bound by the state's concession, on de novo review, we conclude that the state's concession is well founded and agree that the evidence is insufficient.

Reversed.


Summaries of

In re R. A. C

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 27, 2009
209 P.3d 426 (Or. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

In re R. A. C

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of R. A. C., aka S. B., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 27, 2009

Citations

209 P.3d 426 (Or. Ct. App. 2009)
209 P.3d 426