From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Quincy Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 26, 2000
276 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

October 26, 2000.

Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about November 19, 1996, which, upon a fact-finding determinations of direct and derivative abuse, placed respondent's son, Quincy Y., with the Commissioner of Social Services for a period of 12 months and placed respondent's daughter, Destiny Y., with her father for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, as to the fact-finding determinations, and the remainder of the appeals, respecting the disposition of the children, unanimously dismissed, as academic, all without costs.

Raymond E. Rogers, for Quincy Y.

Bruce A. Young, for respondent-appellant.

Before: Williams, J.P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Andrias, Buckley, JJ.


A preponderance of the credible evidence established that respondent abused her daughter, Destiny, who sustained a severe and inadequately explained second-degree head burn while in respondent's care (see Family Court Act § 1046 (a)(ii); Matter of Philip M., 82 N.Y.2d 238,243-244;Matter of Jorge S., 211 A.D.2d 513, lv denied 85 N.Y.2d 810). The finding of abuse with respect to Destiny is additionally warranted by respondent's failure to seek prompt medical attention for Destiny, which omission required Destiny's hospitalization for a period of weeks when the untreated burn became infected.

Also proper under the circumstances of this case was the derivative finding of abuse with respect to respondent's son Quincy. Proof of physical injury was not necessary as to the directly abused child's sibling (see, Family Court Act § 1046(a)(i); Matter of Jorela L., 222 A.D.2d 282, 283). Respondent's challenge to the placements directed in the appealed order is academic since the one-year term of those placements has expired and subsequent orders extending the children's placements have been entered (see, Matter of Angelina E., 213 A.D.2d 346, 347; Matter of Jorge S., supra).

On the totality of the existing record, it is clear that respondent received effective assistance of counsel in this matter.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In re Quincy Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 26, 2000
276 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

In re Quincy Y

Case Details

Full title:IN RE QUINCY Y., ET AL., CHILDREN UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE, ETC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 26, 2000

Citations

276 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
714 N.Y.S.2d 293

Citing Cases

Southern v. Avrum M.

" Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. on Behalf of Douglas E., 191 AD2d 694, 694 (2nd Dep't…

Ndaka C. v. (In re Kaiyeem C.)

The testimony of petitioner's expert, who was the pediatrician who examined and treated the child when she…