From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Quiksilver, Inc. Derivative Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 2, 2013
Case No. 8:12-CV-01882-AG-JPR (C.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 8:12-CV-01882-AG-JPR

05-02-2013

IN RE QUIKSILVER, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS.

MICHAEL G. YODER (S.B. #83059) BRIAN NEACH (S.B. #242801) O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Attorneys for Defendants ROBERT B. MCKNIGHT, JR., WILLIAM M. BARNUM, JR., JOSEPH BERARDINO, JAMES G. ELLIS, CHARLES S. EXON, M. STEVEN LANGMAN, ROBERT L. METTLER, PAUL C. SPEAKER, and ANDREW W. SWEET and Nominal Defendant, QUIKSILVER, INC.


MICHAEL G. YODER (S.B. #83059)
BRIAN NEACH (S.B. #242801)
O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Attorneys for Defendants
ROBERT B. MCKNIGHT, JR., WILLIAM M.
BARNUM, JR., JOSEPH BERARDINO,
JAMES G. ELLIS, CHARLES S. EXON, M.
STEVEN LANGMAN, ROBERT L.
METTLER, PAUL C. SPEAKER, and
ANDREW W. SWEET and Nominal
Defendant, QUIKSILVER, INC.

(Consolidated with Case No. 8:12-CV-

02071-AG-JPR)


FINAL JUDGMENT


Judge: Hon. Andrew J. Guilford

FINAL JUDGMENT

Having granted Nominal Defendant Quiksilver, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss, and Individual Defendants Robert B. McKnight, Jr., William M. Barnum, Jr., Joseph F. Berardino, James G. Ellis, Charles S. Exon, M. Steven Langman, Robert L. Mettler, Paul C. Speaker, and Andrew W. Sweet's Motion to Dismiss, see Court's Omnibus Order Re Defendants' Motion to Stay and Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 59) ("Omnibus Order"), and in light Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Final Order and Judgment (Dkt. No. 69),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:

1. Judgment is entered in favor of all Defendants and against Plaintiff's Patricia Stockman-Sann and Alaska Electrical Pension Fund.

On April 22, 2013, this Court granted the Stipulation Re: Operative Complaint for Consolidated Action, pursuant to which the cases Alaska Electrical Pension Fund v. McKnight, No. 8:12-cv-02071-AG-JPR and Stockman-Sann v. McKnight, No. 8:12-cv-01882, were consolidated. Accordingly, this judgment applies to both actions.

2. Plaintiff shall recover nothing in this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

Honorable Andrew Guilford

United States District Judge


Summaries of

In re Quiksilver, Inc. Derivative Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 2, 2013
Case No. 8:12-CV-01882-AG-JPR (C.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)
Case details for

In re Quiksilver, Inc. Derivative Litig.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE QUIKSILVER, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 2, 2013

Citations

Case No. 8:12-CV-01882-AG-JPR (C.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)