In re Prokop

Full title: IN RE DAVID M. PROKOP

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 12, 2015

589 F. App'x 987 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Opinion

2014-1423

01-12-2015

IN RE DAVID M. PROKOP

KEVIN A. ZECK, Perkins Coie LLP, of Seattle, Washington, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was RAMSEY M. AL-SALAM. MARY L. KELLY, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were Nathan K. Kelley, Solicitor, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Deputy Solicitor, and FARHEENA Y. RASHEED, Associate Solicitor.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in serial No. 90/012,124.

JUDGMENT

KEVIN A. ZECK, Perkins Coie LLP, of Seattle, Washington, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was RAMSEY M. AL-SALAM. MARY L. KELLY, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were Nathan K. Kelley, Solicitor, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Deputy Solicitor, and FARHEENA Y. RASHEED, Associate Solicitor. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (WALLACH, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 12, 2015
Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court