From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Proctor

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 4, 2021
No. 20-1750 (4th Cir. Mar. 4, 2021)

Opinion

No. 20-1750

03-04-2021

In re: MAURICE CORTEZ PROCTOR, SR., Petitioner.

Maurice Cortez Proctor, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se. Jason Daniel Medinger, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:85-cr-00547-DKC-1) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maurice Cortez Proctor, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se. Jason Daniel Medinger, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Maurice Cortez Proctor, Sr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court recently took significant action on Proctor's § 2255 motion. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We deny Proctor's motion for immediate consideration and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Proctor

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 4, 2021
No. 20-1750 (4th Cir. Mar. 4, 2021)
Case details for

In re Proctor

Case Details

Full title:In re: MAURICE CORTEZ PROCTOR, SR., Petitioner.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 4, 2021

Citations

No. 20-1750 (4th Cir. Mar. 4, 2021)