From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 19, 2011
MDL No. 2002, 08-md-2002 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 19, 2011)

Opinion

MDL No. 2002, 08-md-2002.

October 19, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW, this 19th day of October, 2011, upon consideration of Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Production of Sparboe Documents and Other Information (doc. 511), the accompanying memorandum of law (doc. 514), any responses and replies thereto (docs. 521, 528, 535), after oral argument on September 13, 2011, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED without prejudice in part.

The motion is granted with respect to the six documents at issue. Those documents, identified in the sections III.A through III.D of the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, shall be produced to Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and/or removed from sequestration, as appropriate, within fourteen (14) days of this Order.

The motion is denied without prejudice with respect to the contested witness interviews. The parties shall revisit the information contained in the interviews, endeavor to resolve any outstanding privilege issues left unresolved by the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, and request intervention from the Court if necessary within twenty-eight (28) days of this Order.


Summaries of

In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 19, 2011
MDL No. 2002, 08-md-2002 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 19, 2011)
Case details for

In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: PROCESSED EGG PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION v. THIS DOCUMENT…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 19, 2011

Citations

MDL No. 2002, 08-md-2002 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 19, 2011)