From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Proceeding, Com. of S.S., v. Darryl B

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 5, 2003
306 A.D.2d 54 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1310

June 5, 2003.

Order, Family Court, New York County (Gloria Sosa-Lintner, J.), entered on or about July 30, 2001, which granted petitioner's objection to the Hearing Examiner's order suspending respondent's child support obligation during the period of his incarceration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Sharyn Rootenberg, for petitioner-respondent.

John J. Marafino, for respondent-appellant.

Before: Tom, J.P., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Wallach, Gonzalez, JJ.

Deceased June 1, 2003.


The objection was properly granted on the ground that respondent's financial hardship was solely the result of his purposeful and wrongful conduct culminating in his conviction and incarceration (Matter of Knights v. Knights, 71 N.Y.2d 865;Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v. Bayona, 279 A.D.2d 305).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In re Proceeding, Com. of S.S., v. Darryl B

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 5, 2003
306 A.D.2d 54 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In re Proceeding, Com. of S.S., v. Darryl B

Case Details

Full title:IN RE PROCEEDING, ETC., COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ETC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 5, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 54 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
759 N.Y.S.2d 676

Citing Cases

In Matter of Janet E. v. Antonio B.

In those instances a support order was entered prior to the criminal sentence and incarceration of the payer,…