From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Preziosi

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 18, 2017
150 A.D.3d 1540 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

05-18-2017

In the Matter of Joseph S. PREZIOSI, an Attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 1922020).

Joseph S. Preziosi, Maywood, New Jersey, pro se. Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.


Joseph S. Preziosi, Maywood, New Jersey, pro se.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Before: PETERS, P.J., GARRY, EGAN JR., CLARK and AARONS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Joseph S. Preziosi was admitted to practice by this Court in 1984 and lists a business address in Jersey City, New Jersey with the Office of Court Administration. Preziosi has applied to this Court, by affidavit sworn to November 5, 2016, for leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons (see Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a] ). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) opposes the application, contending that Preziosi is ineligible for nondisciplinary resignation because he has failed to fulfill his attorney registration requirements for the most recent biennial period beginning in 2016 (see Judiciary Law § 468–a ; Matter of Lee, 148 A.D.3d 1350, 47 N.Y.S.3d 923 [2017] ; Matter of Bomba, 146 A.D.3d 1226, 1226–1227, 46 N.Y.S.3d 433 [2017] ; Rules of the Chief Admin of Cts. [22 NYCRR] § 118.1 ).

In reply to AGC's opposition, however, Preziosi has submitted correspondence dated May 8, 2017 in which he indicates that he is now current in his New York attorney registration requirements. Furthermore, Office of Court Administration records likewise establish that Preziosi has duly registered and cured any preexisting registration delinquency. Accordingly, with AGC voicing no other substantive objection to his application, and having determined that Preziosi is now eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons (compare Matter of Tierney, 148 A.D.3d 1457, 1458, 51 N.Y.S.3d 638 [2017] ; Matter of Bomba, 146 A.D.3d at 1227, 46 N.Y.S.3d 433 ), we grant the application and accept his resignation

ORDERED that Joseph S. Preziosi's application for permission to resign is granted and his nondisciplinary resignation is accepted; and it is further

ORDERED that Joseph S. Preziosi's name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court (see generally Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [b] ); and it is further

ORDERED that, effective immediately, Joseph S. Preziosi is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form in the State of New York, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and Preziosi is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto, or to hold himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State; and it is further

ORDERED that Joseph S. Preziosi shall, within 30 days of the date of this decision, surrender to the Office of Court Administration any Attorney Secure Pass issued to him.


Summaries of

In re Preziosi

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 18, 2017
150 A.D.3d 1540 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

In re Preziosi

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Joseph S. PREZIOSI, an Attorney. (Attorney Registration…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: May 18, 2017

Citations

150 A.D.3d 1540 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
150 A.D.3d 1540

Citing Cases

In re Zachariah

Furthermore, Office of Court Administration records likewise establish that Zachariah has duly registered and…

In re Zachariah

Furthermore, Office of Court Administration records likewise establish that Zachariah has duly registered and…