From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Prempro Products Liability Litigation

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
Jul 28, 2006
MDL Docket No. 4:03CV1507-WRW, 4:05CV00163 (E.D. Ark. Jul. 28, 2006)

Opinion

MDL Docket No. 4:03CV1507-WRW, 4:05CV00163.

July 28, 2006


ORDER


Pending are Plaintiff's Motion to Compel the Appearance at Trial of Wyeth's Corporate Representatives Michael Dey and Justin Victoria (Doc. No. 256), Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 39 to Exclude References to Dr. Gueriguian's Confrontation with Warner Lambert Company and its Drug Rezulin (Doc. No. 265), and Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration Re: Plaintiff's Motion in Limine 25 — Oral Contraceptive Use (Doc. No. 283).

A. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Appearance

Plaintiff's Motion to Compel the Appearance at Trial of Wyeth's Corporate Representatives Michael Dey and Justin Victoria (Doc. No. 256) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's counsel are directed to be reasonably accommodating to these individuals insofar as their appearance at trial is concerned (as an example, I assume Plaintiff's counsel does not intend to have them in the courthouse in Little Rock for the entire trial). B. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 39

See American Federation of Government Employees Local 922 v. Ashcroft, 354 F. Supp. 2d 909 (E.D. Ark. 2003); In Re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation, 2:05-MD-01657-EEF, 2006 WL 2037349 (E.D. La. Jul. 21, 2006).

Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 39 to Exclude References to Dr. Gueriguian's Confrontation with Warner Lambert Company and its Drug Rezulin (Doc. No 265) is DENIED.

C. Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration

Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration Re: Plaintiff's Motion in Limine 25 — Oral Contraceptive Use (Doc. No. 283) is DENIED. The exclusion of this evidence is bottomed upon FRE 403, not FRE 402.

I assume that Defendant has no evidence that Plaintiff was specifically warned about the risks associated with oral contraceptives.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Prempro Products Liability Litigation

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
Jul 28, 2006
MDL Docket No. 4:03CV1507-WRW, 4:05CV00163 (E.D. Ark. Jul. 28, 2006)
Case details for

In re Prempro Products Liability Litigation

Case Details

Full title:In re: PREMPRO PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. LINDA REEVES Plaintiff, v…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division

Date published: Jul 28, 2006

Citations

MDL Docket No. 4:03CV1507-WRW, 4:05CV00163 (E.D. Ark. Jul. 28, 2006)