From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Porter

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Jan 15, 2015
NO. 14-15-00014-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 15, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 14-15-00014-CR

01-15-2015

IN RE CRAIG PORTER, Relator


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 263rd District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1374093

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 6, 2015, relator Craig Porter filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Jim Wallace, presiding judge of the 263rd District Court of Harris County, to rule on his pro se motion for speedy trial.

In another mandamus proceeding recently filed in this court, relator stated that he was represented by trial counsel. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The issues relator raises in his pro se petition for writ of mandamus relate directly to a criminal proceeding in which he is presented by counsel. Therefore, in the absence of a right to hybrid representation, relator has presented nothing for this court's consideration. See Patrick, 906 S.W.2d at 498.

Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Donovan, and Wise.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

In re Porter, No. 14-14-01015-CR, 2015 WL 128548 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 8, 2015, orig. proceeding) (mem. op., not designation for publication).


Summaries of

In re Porter

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Jan 15, 2015
NO. 14-15-00014-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 15, 2015)
Case details for

In re Porter

Case Details

Full title:IN RE CRAIG PORTER, Relator

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 15, 2015

Citations

NO. 14-15-00014-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 15, 2015)

Citing Cases

Porter v. State

The record reflects that Porter had not been permitted hybrid representation. SeeEx parte Porter , No.…

In re Porter

This court denied relator's pro se mandamus petition, noting that relator is represented by counsel in the…