From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Philips Recalled CPAP, BI-Level PAP, & Mech. Ventilator Prods. Liab. Litig.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 3, 2022
MDL 3014 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 3, 2022)

Opinion

MDL 3014

03-03-2022

IN RE: PHILIPS RECALLED CPAP, BI-LEVEL PAP, AND MECHANICAL VENTILATOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION


(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -19)

On October 8, 2021, the Panel transferred 10 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407. See __ F.Supp.3d __ (J.P.M.L. 2021). Since that time, 157 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Western District of Pennsylvania. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Joy Flowers Conti.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Western District of Pennsylvania and assigned to Judge Conti.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Western District of Pennsylvania for the reasons stated in the order of October 8, 2021, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Joy Flowers Conti.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

SCHEDULE CTO-19 - TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST

DIV.

C.A.NO.

CASE CAPTION

ARKANSAS EASTERN

ARE

2

22−00030

Carter v. Phillips North America LLC et al

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN

CAN

4

22−00911

Hoze v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al

LOUISIANA EASTERN

LAE

2

22−00391

Barnes v. Koninklijke Philips NV et al

LAE

2

22−00392

Trosclair v. Koninklijke Philips NV et al

MARYLAND

MD

8

22−00390

Lawrence v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al

MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN

MSS

5

22−00009

L. E. S. v. Koninklijke Philips N.V, et al

TEXAS WESTERN

TXW

1

22−00124

Stillman v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al


Summaries of

In re Philips Recalled CPAP, BI-Level PAP, & Mech. Ventilator Prods. Liab. Litig.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 3, 2022
MDL 3014 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 3, 2022)
Case details for

In re Philips Recalled CPAP, BI-Level PAP, & Mech. Ventilator Prods. Liab. Litig.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: PHILIPS RECALLED CPAP, BI-LEVEL PAP, AND MECHANICAL VENTILATOR…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 3, 2022

Citations

MDL 3014 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 3, 2022)