From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Phenylpropanolamine

United States District Court, W.D. Washington
May 24, 2004
MDL NO. 1407 (W.D. Wash. May. 24, 2004)

Opinion

MDL NO. 1407

May 24, 2004


ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION


Defendant Bayer Corporation ("Bayer") and defendants Block Drug Company ("Block") filed motions for reconsideration of this court's December 5, 2003 Order Granting Motion for Extension to Complete Plaintiffs' Fact Sheets.

Local Rule 7(h) provides:

Motions for reconsideration are disfavored. The court will ordinarily deny such motions in the absence of a showing of manifest error in the prior ruling or a showing of new facts or legal authority which could not have been brought to its attention earlier with reason-able diligence.

Defendants have failed to show either manifest error or new facts or legal authority that could not with reasonable diligence have been brought to the court's attention earlier. The Court hereby DENIES defendants' motions for reconsideration. DATED at Seattle, Washington this 24th day of May, 2004.

APPENDIX A

Arrington, Bridgette No. 03-3420 Bivens, Lonnie No. 03-1106 Fleming, Theodore No. 03-2696 Gooden, Eta Mae No. 03-2704 Goodin, Laurie No. 03-3266 Knight, Joe No. 03-851 Madison, Virginia No. 03-2695 Mitchell, Remona No. 03-3457 Sansing, Peggy No. 03-3424 Watson, Emma No. 03-2705


Summaries of

In re Phenylpropanolamine

United States District Court, W.D. Washington
May 24, 2004
MDL NO. 1407 (W.D. Wash. May. 24, 2004)
Case details for

In re Phenylpropanolamine

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE (PPA) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, This…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington

Date published: May 24, 2004

Citations

MDL NO. 1407 (W.D. Wash. May. 24, 2004)