From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Petruska

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Aug 7, 2017
No. 05-17-00668-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 7, 2017)

Opinion

No. 05-17-00668-CV

08-07-2017

IN RE DAVID C. PETRUSKA, Relator


Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-03303-B

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Francis, Brown, and Whitehill
Opinion by Justice Brown

Before the Court is relator's June 14, 2017 petition for writ of mandamus. In this original proceeding, relator complains the trial court abused its discretion by denying his motion for real party in interest to submit to a psychological examination by relator's expert. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested.

Accordingly, we deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

/Ada Brown/

ADA BROWN

JUSTICE 170668F.P05


Summaries of

In re Petruska

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Aug 7, 2017
No. 05-17-00668-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 7, 2017)
Case details for

In re Petruska

Case Details

Full title:IN RE DAVID C. PETRUSKA, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Aug 7, 2017

Citations

No. 05-17-00668-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 7, 2017)