From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

IN RE PETITION OF SPEEDY JOHNSON'S FUN CRUISE, INC.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division
Mar 28, 2006
Case No. 2:05-cv-366-FtM-33SPC (M.D. Fla. Mar. 28, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 2:05-cv-366-FtM-33SPC.

March 28, 2006


ORDER


This matter comes before the Court pursuant to Respondent/Claimants' Notice of Filing Report and Recommendations of Guardian Ad Litem Andrew B. Yaffa, Esquire (Doc. # 43-1) and Petition for Approval of a Settlement Involving a Minor (Doc. # 44-1).

Pursuant to this Court's Order of February 21, 2006 (Doc. # 40), Respondent/Claimant has filed the above Report and Recommendation and Settlement Agreement. The Report and Recommendation recommends that this Court grant the petition for approval of the settlement in this case. The Court has evaluated the terms of the settlement agreement and the Report and Recommendation of the Guardian Ad Litem, and finds that the settlement with the minor child is fair, reasonable, and in the best interest of the minor child. Thus, the Court will follow the recommendations of the Guardian Ad Litem as stated in the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Respondent/Claimants' Petition for Approval of a Settlement Involving a Minor (Doc. # 44-1).

The Report and Recommendation of the Court Appointed Guardian Ad Litem complies with Florida Probate Rule 5.636, which states in pertinent part:

(d) Guardian Ad Litem. — The court shall appoint a guardian ad litem on behalf of a minor, without bond or notice, with respect to any proposed settlement that exceeds $25,000 and affects the interests of the minor, if:
(1) there is no court-appointed guardian of the minor;
(2) the court-appointed guardian may have an interest adverse to the minor; or
(3) the court determines that representation of the minor's interest is otherwise inadequate.
(e) Valuation of Proposed Settlement. — A proposed settlement is deemed to exceed $25,000 if the gross amount payable exceeds $25,000, without reduction to reflect present value or fees and costs.
(f) Report. — A guardian ad litem appointed with respect to a proposed settlement affecting the interests of a minor shall, not later than 5 days prior to the hearing on a petition for order authorizing settlement, file and serve a report indicating the guardian ad litem's determination regarding whether the proposed settlement will be in the best interest of the minor. The report shall include:
(1) a statement of the facts of the minor's claim and the terms of the proposed settlement, including any benefits to any persons or parties with related claims;
(2) a list of the persons interviewed and documents reviewed by the guardian ad litem in evaluating the minor's claim and proposed settlement; and
(3) the guardian ad litem's analysis of whether the proposed settlement will be in the best interest of the minor.
A copy of the report shall be served on those persons on whom service is required in subdivision (c) of this rule.

In addition, as this Court has approved the settlement, this cause be and the same is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice and subject to the right of the parties, within SIXTY days of the date hereof, to submit a stipulated form of final order or judgment, or request an extension of time, should they so choose or for any party to move to reopen the action, upon good cause being shown. After that SIXTY day period, however, without further order, this dismissal shall be deemed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate any previously scheduled deadlines and pending motions, and administratively close the case pending further Order.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

1. Respondent/Claimants' Petition for Approval of a Settlement Involving a Minor (Doc. # 44-1) is GRANTED.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice and, subject to the right of the parties, within SIXTY days of the date hereof, to submit a stipulated form of final order or judgment, or request an extension of time, should they so choose or for any party to move to reopen the action, upon good cause being shown. After that SIXTY day period, however, without further order, this dismissal shall be deemed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate any previously scheduled deadlines and pending motions, and administratively close the case pending further Order.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

IN RE PETITION OF SPEEDY JOHNSON'S FUN CRUISE, INC.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division
Mar 28, 2006
Case No. 2:05-cv-366-FtM-33SPC (M.D. Fla. Mar. 28, 2006)
Case details for

IN RE PETITION OF SPEEDY JOHNSON'S FUN CRUISE, INC.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: THE PETITION OF SPEEDY JOHNSON'S FUN CRUISE, INC., AS OWNER OF THE…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division

Date published: Mar 28, 2006

Citations

Case No. 2:05-cv-366-FtM-33SPC (M.D. Fla. Mar. 28, 2006)