Summary
In Hasler v. Hasler. 1 Bradf. 248, an administrator having the funds of an estate in cash for six years was charged with legal interest, but this was upon the express ground that his failure to show that the funds were kept intact and ready to be paid over, raised a presumption of improper use by him of the funds.
Summary of this case from Matter of SuddsOpinion
No. 20,344.
Filed August 18, 1965.
APPEAL — Dismissal — No Cross-Errors Filed. — Appellants' motion to dismiss appeal was sustained where no assignment of cross-errors had been filed by appellees.
From the Greene Circuit Court, Edwin B. Long, Judge.
Appellants filed their motion to dismiss their appeal.
Appeal dismissed. By the Court in Banc.
Rabb Emison, and Emison Emison, of Vincennes, for appellants.
Hickam Hickam, of Spencer, for appellees.
Appellants, by their counsel, Emison Emison, on August 4, 1965, filed in this court a verified "Motion of Appellants to Voluntarily Dismiss Appeal", with proof of service attached thereto, which verified motion, omitting formal parts, is as follows:
"Come now Appellants and respectfully represent and show to the court that they do not wish to pursue their appeal in the above named cause; that Appellees have filed no assignment of cross errors."
The record discloses that appellants submitted the transcript and assignment of errors on February 20, 1965; that three petitions for extension of time to file appellants' brief were filed and granted, the third extension having expired August 5, 1965.
No appellants' brief was filed.
The motion states, which is supported by the record, that no assignment of cross-errors has been filed by appellees.
The court, having examined said verified motion, also the record, and being duly advised, finds that appellants no longer seek to pursue this appeal; that appellees have filed no assignment of cross-errors, nor have they filed any objections to said motion; and that said motion to dismiss said appeal should be granted.
Appeal dismissed, with costs taxed against appellants.
NOTE. — Reported in 209 N.E.2d 518.