From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Hansmeier

Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Sep 12, 2016
884 N.W.2d 863 (Minn. 2016)

Opinion

No. A15–1855.

09-12-2016

In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Paul Robert HANSMEIER, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0387795.


ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action and supplementary petition alleging that respondent Paul Robert Hansmeier committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline. Hansmeier committed misconduct in the first matter by bringing a lawsuit for the sole purpose of conducting discovery to find the identity of others against whom claims could be made, making misrepresentations to the tribunal, filing articles of termination for a corporation that contained false statements, failing to comply with discovery requests, failing to pay attorney fees assessed against him, and transferring funds out of his law firm in order to avoid paying sanctions. In a second matter, Hansmeier committed misconduct by participating in the initiation of a lawsuit without a basis in law and fact, making false and misleading statements to the court, failing to pay attorney fees assessed against him by the court, and submitting to the court a financial statement that was false, misleading, and deceptive. In a third matter, Hansmeier committed misconduct by bringing a frivolous action for an improper purpose. And in a fourth matter, Hansmeier committed misconduct by testifying falsely during a deposition, bringing a frivolous claim, and perpetrating a fraud upon the court. See Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 3.1, 3.3(a)(1), 3.4(c), 3.4(d), 4.1, 8.4(c), and 8.4(d) ; Ill. R. Prof. Conduct 3.1, 3.3(a), 3.4(c), 4.1, 8.4(c), and 8.4(d); and Cal. R. Prof. Conduct 3–200 and 5–200.

Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 8.5(b) provides that the professional rules to be applied in connection with a matter pending before a tribunal are the professional rules of the jurisdiction.

--------

The parties have filed a stipulation for discipline with the court. In it, respondent withdraws his previously filed answers to the petition and the supplementary petition, admits the allegations of the petition, admits the allegations of the supplementary petition except for one paragraph that the Director withdraws, and waives his procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). The parties jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is an indefinite suspension with no right to petition for reinstatement for 4 years.

The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Respondent Paul Robert Hansmeier is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law, effective 14 days from the date of this order, with no right to petition for reinstatement for 4 years from the effective date of his suspension.

2. Respondent may petition for reinstatement pursuant to Rule 18(a)-(d), RLPR. Reinstatement is conditioned on successful completion of the written examination required for admission to the practice of law by the State Board of Law Examiners on the subject of professional responsibility and satisfaction of continuing legal education requirements pursuant to Rule 18(e), RLPR. 3. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals) and shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.

BY THE COURT:

/s/David R. Stras

Associate Justice


Summaries of

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Hansmeier

Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Sep 12, 2016
884 N.W.2d 863 (Minn. 2016)
Case details for

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Hansmeier

Case Details

Full title:In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Paul Robert HANSMEIER, a…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Date published: Sep 12, 2016

Citations

884 N.W.2d 863 (Minn. 2016)

Citing Cases

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Hansmeier

In September 2016, Hansmeier was indefinitely suspended from the practice of law with no right to petition…

Disability Support All. v. CCRE, LLC

On August 22, 2016, attorney Padraigin Browne substituted for Hansmeier as counsel for Smith. [Docket No. 16]…