From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Blust

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 27, 2016
No. 183 DB 2015 (Pa. Jan. 27, 2016)

Opinion

No. 183 DB 2015 No. 9 RST 2016

01-27-2016

In the Matter of PETER FRANCIS BLUST PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION


Attorney Registration No. 47072 (Out of State) AMENDED ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of January, 2016, the Report and Recommendation of Disciplinary Board Member dated January 19, 2016, is approved and it is ORDERED that Peter Francis Blust, who has been on Administrative Suspension, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.

Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.


Summaries of

In re Blust

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 27, 2016
No. 183 DB 2015 (Pa. Jan. 27, 2016)
Case details for

In re Blust

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PETER FRANCIS BLUST PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 27, 2016

Citations

No. 183 DB 2015 (Pa. Jan. 27, 2016)