Opinion
2011-1158
10-13-2011
THOMAS J. SCOTT, JR., Goodwin Procter, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. NATHAN K. KELLEY, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER, Associate Solicitor.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in
Reexamination Nos. 90/006,563 and 90/006,698.
JUDGMENT
THOMAS J. SCOTT, JR., Goodwin Procter, LLP, of
Washington, DC, argued for appellant.
NATHAN K. KELLEY, Associate Solicitor, Office of the
Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of
Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on
the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and SCOTT C.
WEIDENFELLER, Associate Solicitor.
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LINN, PROST, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Jan Horbaly
Clerk