From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Perkins

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 15, 2021
No. 21-1287 (4th Cir. Sep. 15, 2021)

Opinion

21-1287

09-15-2021

In re: VICTOR BERNARD PERKINS, Petitioner.

Victor Bernard Perkins, Petitioner Pro Se. Genna Danelle Petre, Special Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: September 7, 2021

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:92-hc-00654-BR)

Victor Bernard Perkins, Petitioner Pro Se.

Genna Danelle Petre, Special Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Respondent.

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Victor Bernard Perkins petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for compassionate release. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court denied the motion without prejudice on August 27, 2021. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Perkins' motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.


Summaries of

In re Perkins

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 15, 2021
No. 21-1287 (4th Cir. Sep. 15, 2021)
Case details for

In re Perkins

Case Details

Full title:In re: VICTOR BERNARD PERKINS, Petitioner.

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 15, 2021

Citations

No. 21-1287 (4th Cir. Sep. 15, 2021)