From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Perkins

Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler
Jun 11, 2008
No. 12-08-00194-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 11, 2008)

Opinion

No. 12-08-00194-CV

Opinion delivered June 11, 2008.

Original Proceeding.

Panel consisted of WORTHEN, C.J., GRIFFITH, J., and HOYLE, J.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Deborah Ann Perkins filed this original mandamus proceeding complaining that the trial court had failed to rule on various pretrial motions, effectively causing the trial of her suit to be indefinitely postponed. We requested a response to Perkins's petition for writ of mandamus, following which the trial court provided us with orders showing that it had ruled on all but Perkins's first amended motion in limine.

Nothing in Perkins's mandamus petition indicates that the trial court's failure to rule on the motion in limine would cause any further postponement of trial. Consequently, we requested Perkins to show, on or before June 2, 2008, why this proceeding should not be dismissed as moot. To date, Perkins has not made the requested showing. Accordingly, this original proceeding is dismissed as moot .


Summaries of

In re Perkins

Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler
Jun 11, 2008
No. 12-08-00194-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 11, 2008)
Case details for

In re Perkins

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: DEBRA ANN PERKINS, RELATOR

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler

Date published: Jun 11, 2008

Citations

No. 12-08-00194-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 11, 2008)