From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Perkins

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District, Eastland
Mar 16, 2006
No. 11-06-00035-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 16, 2006)

Opinion

No. 11-06-00035-CV

Opinion filed March 16, 2006.

Original Mandamus Proceeding.

Panel consists of: WRIGHT, C.J., and McCALL, J., and STRANGE, J.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On February 6, 2006, this court received Danny Lee Perkins's pro se petition for writ of mandamus. The petition did not comply with the requirements of Tex.R.App.P. 52, and Perkins failed to either file the required fee or comply with TEX. R. APP. P. 20. The clerk of this court informed Perkins of these defects in a letter dated February 6, 2006. Perkins has not responded to our February 6 letter.

Perkins has failed to invoke the original jurisdiction of this court. This proceeding is dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Perkins

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District, Eastland
Mar 16, 2006
No. 11-06-00035-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 16, 2006)
Case details for

In re Perkins

Case Details

Full title:IN RE DANNY LEE PERKINS

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District, Eastland

Date published: Mar 16, 2006

Citations

No. 11-06-00035-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 16, 2006)