From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Penn Camera Exch., Inc.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Greenbelt Division
Apr 13, 2012
Case No. 12-10113 (PM) (Bankr. D. Md. Apr. 13, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 12-10113 (PM)

2012-04-13

In re: PENN CAMERA EXCHANGE, INC., Debtor.

SHULMAN, RODGERS, GANDAL; PORDY & ECKER, P.A. Michael J. Lichtenstein, Esquire Attorneys for the Official Committee Of Unsecured Creditors ZUCKERMAN SPAEDER LLP Nelson C. Cohen, Esquire Attorneys for Perm Camera Exchange, Inc. HERRICK, FEINSTEIN LLP Paul Rubin, Esquire Attorneys for Canon U.S.A., Inc. HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP Daniel Lubell, Esquire One Battery Park Plaza Attorneys for Nikon Inc.


SO ORDERED

___________


U. S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

Chapter 11


STIPULATION AND CONSENT ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR

THE DEBTOR TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO THE SECTION 503(b)(9)

CLAIMS OF CANON U.S.A., INC. AND NIKON INC.

This Stipulation and Consent Order is made by and among Canon U.S.A., Inc. ("Canon"), Nikon Inc. ("Nikon," collectively with Canon, the "Section 503(b)(9) Claimants"), and Penn Camera Exchange, Inc. (the "Debtor"), individually and by and through their respective counsel of record (collectively, the "Parties"). The Parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

RECITALS

A. On January 4, 2012 (the "Petition Date"), the Debtor filed a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland (the "Court").

B. On January 4, 2012, the Debtor filed Debtor's Motion for Order Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sections 105(a), 362, and 546 (I) Establishing Procedures for Addressing Reclamation Demands, (II) Authorizing Debtor to Return Goods Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sections 546(h) and (III) Prohibiting Parties from Interfering with the Delivery of Goods (the "Reclamation Motion") [D.I. 6].

C. On February 22, 2012, the Court granted the Reclamation Motion and entered its Order Establishing Procedures for Asserting Claims Under Section 503(b)(9) (the "Procedures Order") [D.I. 171]. Under the Procedures Order, creditors were directed to make their claims pursuant to section 503(b)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code, if any, by serving a written claim on the Debtor and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors on or before March 15, 2012. The Procedures Order further provided that the Debtor had until April 15, 2012 to object to any Section 503(b)(9) claim it received.

D. In accordance with the Procedures Order, Canon submitted a Section 503(b)(9) claim in the amount of $551,587.61. Similarly, Nikon submitted a Section 503(b)(9) claim in the amount of $445,795.96.

E. The Section 503(b)(9) Claimants were the Debtor's two largest vendors and have made the largest claims under section 503(b)(9).

F. At this time the Debtor and the Section 503(b)(9) Claimants are working together to determine whether they can resolve the Section 503(b)(9) claims, however, they do not anticipate such efforts will be concluded prior to the April 15 objection deadline established in the Procedures Order.

G. The Parties believe that it is in the best interest of the estate that they have an opportunity to resolve the Section 503(b)(9) claims of the Section 503(b)(9) Claimants prior to the submission of any objection.

STIPULATION

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to by and between the Parties as follows:

1. The Recitals set forth above are hereby incorporated in full and made a part of this Stipulation.

2. The Procedures Order shall be modified with respect to the Section 503(b)(9) claims of Canon and Nikon to extend the time within which the Debtor must file its objection to their respective Section 503(b)(9) claims to May 7, 2012.

3. This Stipulation shall be binding on and shall inure to the benefits of the Parties, and any successors in interest, assignees, trustees, examiners, agents, and representatives.

4. Each party and/or counsel signing below warrants that he or she has full authority to do so on behalf of the party he or she purports to bind.

5. This Stipulation sets forth the entire agreement and understanding of the Parties hereto with respect to the subject matter herein and supersedes and merges all prior oral and written agreements, discussions and understandings between the Parties with respect thereto, and none of the Parties shall be bound by any conditions, inducements or representations other than as expressly provided for herein.

6. This Stipulation may be executed by facsimile or electronic signature in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one instrument. No term of this Stipulation may be waived, modified or amended except in writing signed by the party against whom enforcement of the waiver, modification or amendment is sought.

IN "WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Stipulation on behalf of their respective clients as of the date hereof.

STIPULATED AND AGREED

SHULMAN, RODGERS, GANDAL;

PORDY & ECKER, P.A.

By: ____________

Michael J. Lichtenstein, Esquire

Attorneys for the Official Committee

Of Unsecured Creditors

ZUCKERMAN SPAEDER LLP

By: ____________

Nelson C. Cohen, Esquire

Attorneys for Perm Camera Exchange, Inc.

HERRICK, FEINSTEIN LLP

By: ____________

Paul Rubin, Esquire

Attorneys for Canon U.S.A., Inc.

HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP

By: ____________

Daniel Lubell, Esquire

One Battery Park Plaza

Attorneys for Nikon Inc. Copies to:

Nelson C. Cohen, Esquire

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP

1201 Connecticut Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20036

The Office of the United States Trustee

6305 Ivy Lane

Suite 600

Greenbelt,MD 20770

Richard E. Hagerty, Esq.

Troutman Sanders LLP

1660 International Drive Suite 600

McLean, VA 22102

Michael J. Lichtenstein, Esq.

Shulman, Rodgers, Gandal, Pordy & Ecker, P.A.

12505 Park Potomac Avenue, Suite 600

Potomac, MD 20854

Paul Rubin, Esquire

Herrick, Feinstein LLP

2 Park Avenue

New York, New York 10016

Daniel Lubell, Esquire

Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

One Battery Park Plaza

New York, New York 10004-1482


Summaries of

In re Penn Camera Exch., Inc.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Greenbelt Division
Apr 13, 2012
Case No. 12-10113 (PM) (Bankr. D. Md. Apr. 13, 2012)
Case details for

In re Penn Camera Exch., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In re: PENN CAMERA EXCHANGE, INC., Debtor.

Court:UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Greenbelt Division

Date published: Apr 13, 2012

Citations

Case No. 12-10113 (PM) (Bankr. D. Md. Apr. 13, 2012)