From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In Re: Pearson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 22, 2008
304 F. App'x 215 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-1413.

Submitted: November 19, 2008.

Decided: December 22, 2008.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:06-cv-00069).

Marion Edward Pearson, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Marion Edward Pearson, Jr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court recently denied Pearson's § 2254 petition. Accordingly, because the district court has decided Pearson's case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.


Summaries of

In Re: Pearson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 22, 2008
304 F. App'x 215 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

In Re: Pearson

Case Details

Full title:In re: Marion Edward PEARSON, Jr., Petitioner

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 22, 2008

Citations

304 F. App'x 215 (4th Cir. 2008)