From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Paul

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 4, 2014
120 A.D.3d 1462 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-09-4

In the Matter of Roger L. PAUL, an Attorney. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Roger L. Paul, Respondent.

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Michael K. Creaser of counsel), for petitioner. Corrigan, McCoy & Bush, PLLC, Rensselaer (Scott W. Bush of counsel), for respondent.


Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Michael K. Creaser of counsel), for petitioner. Corrigan, McCoy & Bush, PLLC, Rensselaer (Scott W. Bush of counsel), for respondent.
Before: McCARTHY, J.P., GARRY, EGAN JR., LYNCH and DEVINE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1978. He maintains an office for the practice of law in the Village of Northville, Fulton County.

By decision dated May 31, 2012, this Court suspended respondent from the practice of law for two years, which suspension was conditionally stayed (Matter of Paul, 95 A.D.3d 1647, 944 N.Y.S.2d 925 [2012] ). Respondent moves for termination of the stayed suspension and provides a supporting affidavit indicating that he has fully complied with the conditions of the stay. Petitioner does not oppose the motion, which we now grant.

ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted, and the stayed suspension imposed by this Court's decision dated May 31, 2012 is terminated, effective immediately. McCARTHY, J.P., GARRY, EGAN JR., LYNCH and DEVINE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Paul

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 4, 2014
120 A.D.3d 1462 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

In re Paul

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Roger L. PAUL, an Attorney. Committee on Professional…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 4, 2014

Citations

120 A.D.3d 1462 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 6030
991 N.Y.S.2d 778

Citing Cases

Comm. on Prof'l Standards v. Galvin (In re Galvin)

In doing so, we initially note that this Court's extension of respondent's stayed suspension is not set to…

In re Mccallig

We find that petitioner has provided sufficient proof establishing respondent's failure to comply with the…