From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Patel

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
May 3, 2022
No. 05-22-00159-CV (Tex. App. May. 3, 2022)

Opinion

05-22-00159-CV

05-03-2022

IN RE KETTAN PATEL, BHARAT PATEL, AND JAYESH PATEL, Relators


Original Proceeding from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-00572

Before Justices Osborne, Partida-Kipness, and Smith

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LESLIE OSBORNE, JUSTICE

Relators' March 1, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus challenges the trial court's order granting real parties in interest's motion to compel discovery of financial information. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that they have no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown their entitlement to the relief requested. See In re Rowes, No. 05-14-00606-CV, 2014 WL 2452723, at *1 (Tex. App.-Dallas May 30, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (noting that "[a] court cannot grant mandamus relief unless the error was raised in the trial court," and that a party seeking mandamus "must direct the Court to where the argument was presented to the trial court"). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.


Summaries of

In re Patel

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
May 3, 2022
No. 05-22-00159-CV (Tex. App. May. 3, 2022)
Case details for

In re Patel

Case Details

Full title:IN RE KETTAN PATEL, BHARAT PATEL, AND JAYESH PATEL, Relators

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: May 3, 2022

Citations

No. 05-22-00159-CV (Tex. App. May. 3, 2022)