From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Parnell

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 17, 2021
No. 21-1733 (4th Cir. Sep. 17, 2021)

Opinion

21-1733

09-17-2021

In re: ANTONIO PARNELL, a/k/a Antonio Jones, a/k/a Anthony Shaw, a/k/a Jerry L. Cagle, Petitioner.

Antonio Parnell, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: September 14, 2021

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:20-cv-00145; 2:18-cr-00147-1)

Antonio Parnell, Appellant Pro Se.

Before THACKER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Antonio Parnell petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the magistrate judge has unduly delayed in acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket sheet reveals that the magistrate judge recently took significant action on Parnell's § 2255 motion. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Parnell

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 17, 2021
No. 21-1733 (4th Cir. Sep. 17, 2021)
Case details for

In re Parnell

Case Details

Full title:In re: ANTONIO PARNELL, a/k/a Antonio Jones, a/k/a Anthony Shaw, a/k/a…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 17, 2021

Citations

No. 21-1733 (4th Cir. Sep. 17, 2021)