From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Panmore

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 19, 1924
96 N.J. Eq. 397 (N.J. 1924)

Opinion

Decided May 19th, 1924.

On appeal from an order of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, whose opinion is reported in 95 N.J. Eq. 386.

Mr. Klemmer Kalteissen, for the appellant.

Mr. Joseph E. Stricker, for the respondent.


The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS — 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

In re Panmore

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 19, 1924
96 N.J. Eq. 397 (N.J. 1924)
Case details for

In re Panmore

Case Details

Full title:In the matter of the application of SILAS PANMORE (PARAMORE) and SERAI…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 19, 1924

Citations

96 N.J. Eq. 397 (N.J. 1924)

Citing Cases

La Sasso v. MacLeod

The meritorious issues to be decided by the court are that the court shall inquire whether the petitioner is…

In re Colier

"The requisition and rendition are in proper form. Therefore it is for the court to inquire whether the…