From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Care & Treatment of Owen

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 18, 2014
Appellate Case No. 2013-000217 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 18, 2014)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2013-000217 Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-225

06-18-2014

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Ronald Owen, Appellant.

Tommy Arthur Thomas, of Irmo, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.


Appeal From Newberry County

Frank R. Addy, Jr., Circuit Court Judge


AFFIRMED

Tommy Arthur Thomas, of Irmo, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: S.C. Code Ann. § 44-48-130 (Supp. 2013) ("Nothing in this chapter prohibits a person from filing a petition for release pursuant to this chapter. However, if a person has previously filed a petition for release without the approval of the Director of the Department of Mental Health, and the court determined either upon review of the petition or following a hearing that the petitioner's petition was frivolous or that the petitioner's condition had not changed so that the petitioner continued to be a threat and, if released, would commit acts of sexual violence, the court must deny the subsequent petition unless the petition contains facts upon which a court could find the condition of the petitioner had so changed that a hearing was warranted. Upon receipt of a first or subsequent petition from a committed person without the director's approval, the court must, whenever possible, review the petition and determine if the petition is based upon frivolous grounds and, if so, must deny the petition without a hearing."). AFFIRMED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Care & Treatment of Owen

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 18, 2014
Appellate Case No. 2013-000217 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 18, 2014)
Case details for

In re Care & Treatment of Owen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Ronald Owen, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 18, 2014

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2013-000217 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 18, 2014)