Opinion
2003-02310
Argued September 9, 2003.
October 14, 2003.
In a proceeding pursuant to Lien Law § 201-a to cancel a lien, the petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), dated March 7, 2003, as denied that branch of his motion as was for leave to renew the petition.
McCabe, Collins, McGeough Fowler, LLP, Mineola, N.Y. (Patrick J. Engle of counsel), for appellant.
Boland Ialenti, Garden City, N.Y. (Donald J. Boland of counsel), for respondent Hassett Lincoln Mercury Sales, Inc.
Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, HOWARD MILLER, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The petitioner failed to set forth a reasonable justification why the additional facts offered in support of that branch of his motion which was for leave to renew were not offered in support of his original application ( see CPLR 2221[e]; Barbuto v. Winthrop University Hosp., 305 A.D.2d 623; Elias v. Grossman, 306 A.D.2d 432; Matter of Orange Rockland Utils. v. Assessor of Town of Haverstraw, 304 A.D.2d 668). Accordingly, leave to renew was properly denied.
RITTER, J.P., FEUERSTEIN, H. MILLER and ADAMS, JJ., concur.