From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Orenzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 24, 2006
33 A.D.3d 492 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

No. 9328.

October 24, 2006.

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about October 19, 2005, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the third degree and menacing in the third degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Sullivan and McGuire, JJ.


Appellant failed to preserve his challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would conclude that the court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence. We find that the court's finding was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). There is no basis for disturbing the court's determinations concerning credibility and identification. The victim's testimony fully established the element of physical injury ( see People v Guidice, 83 NY2d 630, 636; People v Bailey, 222 AD2d 278, lv denied 87 NY2d 971). Appellant's actions in chasing the victim, causing him to fear an attack, evinced the requisite intent for menacing in the third degree ( see Matter of Salah S., 203 AD2d 368).


Summaries of

In re Orenzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 24, 2006
33 A.D.3d 492 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In re Orenzo

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ORENZO H., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 24, 2006

Citations

33 A.D.3d 492 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 7610
822 N.Y.S.2d 532

Citing Cases

People v. Womack

Thus, a plain reading of the statute would support a finding of probable cause on these facts, in that it…

People v. Vega

A demand for money is not a physical act within the statute's contemplation, even if expressed in an…