From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Docter Optics, SE

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 17, 2017
2017-1126 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 17, 2017)

Opinion

2017-1126

10-17-2017

IN RE: DOCTER OPTICS, SE, Appellant

DEBORAH POLLACK-MILGATE, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Indianapolis, IN, argued for appellant. Also represented by LEAH LEWIS SIEGEL; RICHARD B. LAZARUS, Washington, DC. NATHAN K. KELLEY, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, MARY L. KELLY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/888,706.

JUDGMENT

DEBORAH POLLACK-MILGATE, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Indianapolis, IN, argued for appellant. Also represented by LEAH LEWIS SIEGEL; RICHARD B. LAZARUS, Washington, DC. NATHAN K. KELLEY, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, MARY L. KELLY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 17, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Docter Optics, SE

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 17, 2017
2017-1126 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 17, 2017)
Case details for

In re Docter Optics, SE

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: DOCTER OPTICS, SE, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 17, 2017

Citations

2017-1126 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 17, 2017)