From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 20, 2014
3:10-md-02143-RS-JCS (N.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2014)

Opinion

          Beatrice B. Nguyen, CROWELL & MORING LLP, San Francisco, California, Daniel A. Sasse, CROWELL & MORING LLP, Irvine, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff, HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY.

          CROWELL & MORING LLP, Matthew J. McBurney, Nathanial J. Wood, Angela J. Yu, Attorneys for Plaintiff, Hewlett-Packard Company.

          ASIA LAW FOREIGN LEGAL AFFAIRS LAW FIRM, Christopher M. Neumeyer, Attorneys for Defendants, Quanta Storage, Inc. and Quanta Storage America, Inc.


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

          RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

         STIPULATION

         WHEREAS on May 8, 2014, Plaintiff Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") filed a First Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 26] naming Quanta Storage, Inc. and Quanta Storage America, Inc. (collectively, "Quanta"), among others, as defendants; and

         WHEREAS on June 13, 2014, the Court entered a Stipulation and Order Regarding Extension of Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 31], directing the parties to work in good faith to reach an agreed-upon briefing schedule for any motion of Defendant Quanta to dismiss the First Amended Complaint and to present that agreed-upon briefing schedule to the Court no later than August 22, 2014; and

         WHEREAS on August 7, 2014, Defendant Quanta filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 38] (the "Motion to Dismiss"); and

         WHEREAS Plaintiff HP and Defendant Quanta have conferred and reached agreement on the following proposed briefing schedule for the Motion to Dismiss: that the deadline for any opposition shall be October 7, 2014; and that the deadline for any reply shall be November 4, 2014,

         NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff HP and Defendant Quanta, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree, subject to Court approval, that the following briefing schedule shall apply to the Motion to Dismiss:

         1. The deadline for any opposition shall be October 7, 2014.

         2. The deadline for any reply shall be November 4, 2014.

         3. Motion to Dismiss Hearing shall be heard

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         [PROPOSED] ORDER

         PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 20, 2014
3:10-md-02143-RS-JCS (N.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2014)
Case details for

In re Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION. v. Toshiba…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Aug 20, 2014

Citations

3:10-md-02143-RS-JCS (N.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2014)