Opinion
Beatrice B. Nguyen, CROWELL & MORING LLP, San Francisco, California.
Daniel A. Sasse, CROWELL & MORING LLP, Irvine, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff, HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY.
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP, Belinda S. Lee, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendants Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corporation, Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corporation, Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., and Toshiba Corporation.
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP, Robert B. Pringle, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendant NEC Corporation.
O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP, Ian Simmons, Washington, DC, Attorneys for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP, John F. Cove, Jr., Oakland, CA, Attorneys for Defendants Sony Corporation, Sony Electronics, Inc., Sony Optiarc Inc., and Sony Optiarc America Inc.
KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP, Mary Ellen Hennessy, Chicago, IL, Attorneys for Defendants TEAC Corporation and TEAC America Inc.
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP, Jeffrey L. Kessler, New York, NY, Attorneys for Defendants Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING HEARING DATE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
STIPULATION
WHEREAS on May 8, 2014, Plaintiff Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") filed a First Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 26] against, among others, the undersigned Defendants (collectively, "Defendants"); and
WHEREAS on June 23, 2014, Defendants filed a joint Motion to Dismiss the Fifth and Sixth Causes of Action of HP's First Amended Complaint (the "Motion to Dismiss") [Doc. No. 32], and set a hearing on the Motion to Dismiss for September 18, 2014 (the "Hearing"); and
WHEREAS on June 24, 2014, the Court continued the Hearing to September 25, 2014 [Doc. No. 33]; and
WHEREAS on August 18, 2014, the Court continued the Hearing to November 6, 2014; and
WHEREAS counsel for Plaintiff HP is unavailable on November 6, 2014; and
WHEREAS Plaintiff HP and Defendants have conferred and agreed to continue the Hearing to November 20, 2014;
NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff HP and Defendants, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate, agree, and respectfully request that the Court issue an order that:
The Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shall be reset for November 20, 2014 at 1:30 p.m.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.