From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 28, 2014
MDL Docket 3:10-md-02143-RS-JCS (N.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2014)

Opinion

          Beatrice B. Nguyen, CROWELL & MORING LLP, San Francisco, California.

          Daniel A. Sasse, CROWELL & MORING LLP, Irvine, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff, HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY.

          LATHAM & WATKINS LLP, Belinda S. Lee, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendants Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corporation, Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corporation, Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., and Toshiba Corporation.

          WINSTON & STRAWN LLP, Robert B. Pringle, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendant NEC Corporation.

          O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP, Ian Simmons, Washington, DC, Attorneys for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

          BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP, John F. Cove, Jr., Oakland, CA, Attorneys for Defendants Sony Corporation, Sony Electronics, Inc., Sony Optiarc Inc., and Sony Optiarc America Inc.

          KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP, Mary Ellen Hennessy, Chicago, IL, Attorneys for Defendants TEAC Corporation and TEAC America Inc.

          WINSTON & STRAWN LLP, Jeffrey L. Kessler, New York, NY, Attorneys for Defendants Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America.


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING HEARING DATE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

          RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

         STIPULATION

         WHEREAS on May 8, 2014, Plaintiff Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") filed a First Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 26] against, among others, the undersigned Defendants (collectively, "Defendants"); and

         WHEREAS on June 23, 2014, Defendants filed a joint Motion to Dismiss the Fifth and Sixth Causes of Action of HP's First Amended Complaint (the "Motion to Dismiss") [Doc. No. 32], and set a hearing on the Motion to Dismiss for September 18, 2014 (the "Hearing"); and

         WHEREAS on June 24, 2014, the Court continued the Hearing to September 25, 2014 [Doc. No. 33]; and

         WHEREAS on August 18, 2014, the Court continued the Hearing to November 6, 2014; and

         WHEREAS counsel for Plaintiff HP is unavailable on November 6, 2014; and

         WHEREAS Plaintiff HP and Defendants have conferred and agreed to continue the Hearing to November 20, 2014;

         NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff HP and Defendants, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate, agree, and respectfully request that the Court issue an order that:

         The Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shall be reset for November 20, 2014 at 1:30 p.m.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         [PROPOSED] ORDER

         PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 28, 2014
MDL Docket 3:10-md-02143-RS-JCS (N.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2014)
Case details for

In re Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation

Case Details

Full title:IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION v. Toshiba…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Aug 28, 2014

Citations

MDL Docket 3:10-md-02143-RS-JCS (N.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2014)