From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 29, 2014
MDL Docket 3:10-md-02143 RS (N.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2014)

Opinion

          LATHAM & WATKINS LLP, Belinda S. Lee, San Francisco, CA, Counsel for Defendants Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corporation, Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corporation, Toshiba Corporation, and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.

          CARLTON FIELDS JORDEN BURT, P.A., DAVID B. ESAU, (pro hac vice) West Palm Beach, Florida.

          Hsiang ("James") H. Lin, TECHKNOWLEDGE LAW GROUP LLP, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiffs ACER AMERICA CORPORATION; GATEWAY, INC.; AND GATEWAY U.S. RETAIL, INC., F/K/A EMACHINES, INC.


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CERTAIN DEFENDANTS' RESPONSES TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

          RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

         WHEREAS, on July 10, 2014, the Court entered an Order Denying Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss and Granting the Pioneer Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Leave to Amend (MDL Dkt. 1344);

         WHEREAS, on July 30, 2014, plaintiffs Acer America Corporation, Gateway, Inc., and Gateway U.S. Retail, Inc., f/k/a eMachines, Inc. (collectively, "Acer") filed a Second Amended Complaint for Damages and Injunctive Relief (MDL Dkt. 1361);

         WHEREAS, pursuant to the Joint Stipulation and Order Regarding Defendants' Responses to Second Amended Complaint entered by this Court on July 18, 2014 (MDL Dkt. 1351), Defendants' responses to Acer's Second Amended Complaint are currently due August 29, 2014; and

         WHEREAS, defendants Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corporation ("TSSTK"), Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corporation ("TSST"), Toshiba Corporation ("Toshiba Corp."), and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. ("TAIS") are continuing to review their Answers to Acer's Second Amended Complaint, and Acer has agreed that TSSTK, TSST, Toshiba Corp. and TAIS shall have an additional week, until September 5, 2014, to file their respective Answers.

         It is therefore STIPULATED and AGREED, subject to Court approval, that:

         Defendants TSSTK, TSST, Toshiba Corp. and TAIS shall have until September 5, 2014 to file their respective Answers to Acer's Second Amended Complaint.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the signatories.

         PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 29, 2014
MDL Docket 3:10-md-02143 RS (N.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2014)
Case details for

In re Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation

Case Details

Full title:IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION. v. Lite-On IT…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Aug 29, 2014

Citations

MDL Docket 3:10-md-02143 RS (N.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2014)