From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Optical Disk Drive Prods. Antitrust Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 13, 2013
Case No. 3:10-md-2143 RS (JCS) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:10-md-2143 RS (JCS)

03-13-2013

IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION This document relates to: ALL ACTIONS

Belinda S Lee LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Liaison Counsel on behalf of all Defendants Cadio Zirpoli Guido Saveri R. Alexander Saveri SAVERI & SAVERI, INC. Interim Lead Counsel for Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs Jeff D. Friedman Shana Scarlett HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP Interim Lead Counsel for Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs


[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: AMENDMENT

OF INTERROGATORY RESPONSES,

AND PAGE LIMITS FOR THE MOTION

TO COMPEL INDIRECT PURCHASER

PLAINTIFFS' DISCOVERY RESPONSES

On January 17, 2013, this Court held a discovery conference to address the issues raised in the parties' Joint Discovery Conference Statement filed January 10, 2013 (Dkt. 743). This Order memorializes the rulings on each of the discovery issues raised during the conference.

A. Amendment of Certain Interrogatory Responses

Defendants need only supplement and/or update their responses to Interrogatory Nos. 4, 5, to the extent those responses refer to or rely upon Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(d), twice during this action: (1) on March 15, 2013, and (2) at the close of fact discovery, once that date has been set.

B. Page Limit for Panasonic and Toshiba's Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses from Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs

The oral motion of defendant Panasonic Corporation to exceed the page limitation with respect to the joint letter brief in support of defendants Panasonic Corporation and Toshiba Corporation's motion to compel further discovery responses from the Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs is granted. The page limit for each side shall be five pages, for a total of ten pages.

C. Next Scheduled Discovery Status Conference

This Court will hold the next Discovery Status Conference on February 28, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. The parties shall submit a joint discovery conference statement by February 21, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________________

Judge Joseph C. Spero

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Approved as to form: _____________________
Belinda S Lee
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

Liaison Counsel on behalf of all Defendants

_____________________

Cadio Zirpoli
Guido Saveri
R. Alexander Saveri
SAVERI & SAVERI, INC.
Interim Lead Counsel for Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs _____________________

Jeff D. Friedman
Shana Scarlett
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
Interim Lead Counsel for Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN THE FILING

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule No. 5-1(i)(3), I declare that concurrence has been obtained from each of the above signatories to file this document with the Court.

_____________________

Belinda S Lee

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Brendan A. McShane, declare that I am over the age of eighteen (18) and not a party to the above-entitled entitled action. I am an associate with the law firm of Latham & Watkins LLP, and my office is located at 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000, San Francisco, California 94111. On January 31, 2013, I caused to be filed the following:

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: AMENDMENT OF INTERROGATORY RESPONSES, AND PAGE LIMITS FOR THE MOTION TO COMPEL INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS' DISCOVERY RESPONSES
with the Clerk of the Court using the Official Court Electronic Document Filing System which served copies on all interested parties registered for electronic filing. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

_____________________

Brendan A. McShane


Summaries of

In re Optical Disk Drive Prods. Antitrust Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 13, 2013
Case No. 3:10-md-2143 RS (JCS) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2013)
Case details for

In re Optical Disk Drive Prods. Antitrust Litig.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION This document…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 13, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:10-md-2143 RS (JCS) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2013)