From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Optical Disk Drive Prods. Antitrust Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 11, 2011
Case No. M:10-cv-02143-RS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. M:10-cv-02143-RS MDL No. 2143

10-11-2011

IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Guido Saveri Saveri & Saveri, Inc. Counsel for Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs Jeff D. Friedman Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP Counsel for Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs Jon V. Swenson (S.B. #233054) BAKER BOTTS LLP Counsel for Defendants Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., Lite-On IT Corporation, Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions Corporation and Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions U.S.A., Inc.


Jon V. Swenson (S.B. #233054)

BAKER BOTTS LLP

John M. Taladay

Evan J. Werbel

William C. Lavery

BAKER BOTTS LLP

Counsel for Defendants Koninklijke Philips

Electronics N.V., Lite-On IT Corporation, Philips &

Lite-On Digital Solutions Corporation, and Philips &

Lite-On Digital Solutions U.S.A., Inc

This Document Relates to: ALL ACTIONS

JOINT STIPULATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] TO EXTEND TIME WITHIN

WHICH TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2(a), the direct and indirect purchaser plaintiffs (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), and Defendants Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. ("Philips"), Lite-On IT Corporation ("Lite-On"), and Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions Corporation ("PLDS") and Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions U.S.A., Inc. ("PLDS USA") (collectively, "Defendants"), hereby stipulate and agree, subject to the approval of the Court, to extend the time within which Defendants must move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaints to no later than 30 days after an order of the Court that resolves any motions to dismiss ("MTDs Order") that other defendants may file. In the event that the Court dismisses in its entirety the direct plaintiffs' or the indirect plaintiffs' Amended Complaint, Defendants need not respond to the operative complaint(s) that the Court dismissed.

This extension does not alter or extend any other date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order. This stipulation also does not apply to any other defendant in this matter.

Guido Saveri

Saveri & Saveri, Inc.

Counsel for Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs

Jeff D. Friedman

Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP

Counsel for Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs

Jon V. Swenson (S.B. #233054)

BAKER BOTTS LLP

Counsel for Defendants Koninklijke Philips

Electronics N.V., Lite-On IT Corporation,

Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions

Corporation and Philips & Lite-On Digital

Solutions U.S.A., Inc.

The Honorable Richard Seeborg

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I am a resident of the State of California and over the age of 18 years, and not a party to the within action. My business address is BAKER BOTTS LLP, 620 Hansen Way, Palo Alto, CA 94304.

On October 10, 2011, the following document was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I further certify that I caused the following document to be served upon the below named counsel of record by electronic mail.

JOINT STIPULATION [AND PROPOSED ORDER] TO EXTEND TIME WITHIN WHICH TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

on the parties in this action addressed as follows:

SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST

[×] (BY ELECTRONIC MAIL) The above-described document was transmitted via electronic mail to the email addresses indicated above.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of United States of America that the above is true and correct.

Executed on October 10, 2011 at Palo Alto, California.

Jon Swenson

SERVICE LIST

Guido Saveri

R. Alexander Saveri

Cadio Zirpoli

SAVERI & SAVERI, INC.

Joseph W. Cotchett

Steven N. Williams

Neil Swartzberg

Aron K. Liang

COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY

Bruce L. Simon

PEARSON SIMON WARSHAW & PENNY LLP

Jeff D. Friedman Shana E. Scarlett

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP

Berkeley, CA 94710

Thomas Brown

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

Ian Simmons

OMELVENY & MYERS LLP

1625 Eye St. NW

Washington, D.C. 20006

Daniel M. Wall

Belinda S. Lee

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000

John F. Cove, Jr.

Steven C. Holtzman

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEMER LLP

Jeffrey L. Kessler

David L. Greenspan

DEWEY & LEBOFUF LLP

1301 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10019-6092

Joel B. Kleinman

Lisa M. Kaas

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP

Robert Pringle

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP

Paolo Morante

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

1251 Avenue of the Americas


Summaries of

In re Optical Disk Drive Prods. Antitrust Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 11, 2011
Case No. M:10-cv-02143-RS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)
Case details for

In re Optical Disk Drive Prods. Antitrust Litig.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

Case No. M:10-cv-02143-RS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)