From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re One Chevrolet Baby Grand Auto

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jul 5, 1921
200 P. 144 (Okla. 1921)

Opinion

No. 10282

Opinion Filed July 5, 1921.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Failure to File Brief — Dismissal.

When a case is pending in this court and is set for hearing on the regular printed docket and the plaintiff in error fails to file brief in compliance with rule 7 of this court (47 Okla. vi), under said rule this court may exercise its discretion and dismiss the appeal for failure to file brief.

Error from County Court, Rogers County; Edward Jordan, Judge.

Action to forfeit to the State of Oklahoma one Baby Grand, five passenger, Chevrolet automobile. The State Bank of Collinsville appears as interpleader. Judgment forfeiting the automobile and against the claims of the interpleader. The State Bank of Collinsville appeals. Appeal dismissed.

Goldesberry Boone, for plaintiff in error.

Mack R. Shanks, for defendant in error.


This action was commenced in the county court of Rogers county by petition and return signed and filed by Mack R. Shanks, county attorney, and sworn to by O.W. Payne, deputy sheriff of Rogers county, Oklahoma, showing that on the 9th day of March, 1918, in Rogers county, he arrested one Lon Ruth and R.L. English who were then and there conveying 60 quarts of intoxicating liquor, commonly called whisky, from one place within the state of Oklahoma to another place within the state of Oklahoma, each of which places was definitely and specifically described. That the said 60 quarts of intoxicating liquor were being conveyed in the Chevrolet Baby Grand, five passenger, automobile described in the title hereto. That said car was being used in violation of the prohibitory liquor laws of the state of Oklahoma. The prayer of said petition was that it be set down for hearing to determine whether or not said automobile was being used in violation of the prohibitory liquor laws of the state of Oklahoma and should be forfeited to the state of Oklahoma.

To this petition the State Bank of Collinsville, Oklahoma, filed an interplea. Issues were joined and the case tried to the court, which resulted in a judgment forfeiting the Chevrolet Baby Grand, five passenger, automobile to the state of Oklahoma. From this judgment the interpleader, State Bank of Collinsville, appealed and appears here plaintiff in error.

This case was regularly assigned for submission on June 21, 1921, on the printed docket of this court. The plaintiff in error has not filled a brief. It has not made any showing why it has failed to comply with rule 7 of this court (47 Okla. vi), which provides as follows:

"VII. In each civil cause filed in this court, counsel for plaintiff in error shall, unless otherwise ordered by the court, serve his brief on counsel for defendant in error at least forty (40) days before the case is set for submission. Counsel for plaintiff in error shall file with the clerk of this court twenty (20) copies of such brief within the time above designated, and defendant in error shall, within thirty, (30) days after the service of the brief of plaintiff in error upon him, file with the clerk of this court twenty (20) copies of his answer brief, and serve same upon plaintiff in error; and all reply briefs, except as otherwise ordered by the court, must be filed by the date the case is submitted or called for argument. Proof of service must be filed with the clerk within ten (10) days after service.

"In case of failure to comply with the requirements of this rule, the court may continue or dismiss the cause, or reverse or affirm the judgment, in its discretion."

This appeal is hereby dismissed, because of the failure of plaintiff in error to file brief. Appeal dismissed.

PITCHFORD, V. C. J., and McNEILL, ELTING, and NICHOLSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re One Chevrolet Baby Grand Auto

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jul 5, 1921
200 P. 144 (Okla. 1921)
Case details for

In re One Chevrolet Baby Grand Auto

Case Details

Full title:In re SEIZURE OF ONE CHEVROLET BABY GRAND AUTO, FIVE PASSENGER. MOTOR NO…

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jul 5, 1921

Citations

200 P. 144 (Okla. 1921)
200 P. 144

Citing Cases

Roher v. Bolster

The plaintiff in error has not filed any brief. No showing is made or reason given why briefs have not been…

In re One Overland Roadster Automobile

They have not made any showing why they have failed to comply with rule No. 7 of this court (47 Okla. vi.).…