Opinion
No. 08-04-00041-CR.
March 4, 2004. DO NOT PUBLISH.
An Original Proceeding, In Mandamus.
Before Panel No. 2, BARAJAS, C.J., McCLURE, and CHEW, JJ.
OPINION
Relator Daniel R. Olivarez seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the trial court to set a specific time for the State to respond to his post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus and to correct an order designating issues. Relator argues that the court's order effectively suspends his habeas application indefinitely. This court does not have jurisdiction over matters related to post-conviction writs of habeas corpus. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). Only the Court of Criminal Appeals has the authority to issue a writ of mandamus in this situation. See, e.g., Martin v. Hamlin, 25 S.W.3d 718, 719 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000); McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex.Crim.App. 1992). Therefore, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.