From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ohio Domestic-Violence

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 19, 2007
872 N.E.2d 1212 (Ohio 2007)

Opinion

Submitted August 14, 2007.

Decided September 19, 2007.


{¶ 1} The following dispositions of currently pending appeals and certified conflicts are hereby entered, based on our decision in State v. Carswell, 114 Ohio St.3d 210, 2007-Ohio-3723, 871 N.E.2d 547.

MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, O'DONNELL and CUPP, JJ., concur.

LANZINGER, J., dissents for the reasons stated in her dissenting opinion in State v. Carswell.

I

{¶ 2} The judgments of the courts of appeals in the following eases are affirmed:

{¶ 3} 2006-0336. State v. Burk, 164 Ohio App.3d 740, 2005-Ohio-6727, 843 N.E.2d 1254.

{¶ 4} 2006-0766. Cleveland v. Voies, Cuyahoga App. No. 86317, 2006-Ohio-815, 2006 WL 440341.

{¶ 5} 2006-1032. State v. Campbell, Warren App. No. CA2005-06-069.

{¶ 6} 2006-1292. State v. Douglas, Cuyahoga App. Nos. 86567 and 86568, 2006-Ohio-2343, 2006 WL 1304860.

{¶ 7} 2006-1501. State v. Rodriguez, Huron App. No. H-05-020, 2006-Ohio-3378, 2006 WL 1793688.

{¶ 8} 2006-1862. State v. Wain, Cuyahoga App. No. 86960, 2006-Ohio-4124, 2006 WL 2299205.

{¶ 9} 2006-2092. State v. Jenson, Lake App. No. 2005-L-193, 2006-Ohio-5169, 2006 WL 2796284.

{¶ 10} 2006-2217. State v. Kvasne, 169 Ohio App.3d 167, 2006-Ohio-5235, 862 N.E.2d 171.

II

{¶ 11} The judgments of the courts of appeals in the following cases are reversed:

{¶ 12} 2006-0905. State v. Ward, 166 Ohio App.3d 188, 2006-Ohio-1407, 849 N.E.2d 1076.

{¶ 13} 2006-0949. State v. Phillips, Montgomery App. No. 21128, 2006-Ohio-1607, 2006 WL 827400.

{¶ 14} 2006-0987. State v. McIntosh, Montgomery App. No. 21093, 2006-Ohio-1815, 2006 WL 925179.

{¶ 15} 2006-1010. State v. Peterson, Greene App. No. 2005 CA 44, 2006-Ohio-1816, 2006 WL 925158.

{¶ 16} 2006-1011. State v. Woullard, Greene App. No. 2005 CA 61, 2006-Ohio-1804, 2006 WL 925160.

{¶ 17} 2006-1095. State v. Maddox, Montgomery App. No. 21133, 2006-Ohio-2127, 2006 WL 1132387.

{¶ 18} 2006-1255. State v. Robinson, Greene App. No. 2005 CA 62, 2006-Ohio-2650, 2006 WL 1461075.

{¶ 19} 2006-1256. State v. Davis, Greene App. No. 2005 CA 60, 2006-Ohio-2633, 2006 WL 1453112.

{¶ 20} 2006-1580. State v. Wagoner, Montgomery App. No. 21225, 2006-Ohio-3760, 2006 WL 2044173.

{¶ 21} 2006-1760. State v. Newman, Montgomery App. No. 21264, 2006-Ohio-4160, 2006 WL 2336626.

III

{¶ 22} The certified conflicts in the following cases are answered by the opinion:

{¶ 23} , 2006-0988. State v. McIntosh, Montgomery App. No. 21093, 2006-Ohio-1815, 2006 WL 925179.

{¶ 24} 2006-1024, State v. Phillips, Montgomery App. No. 21128, 2006-Ohio-1607, 2006 WL 827400.

{¶ 25} 2006-1110. State v. Maddox, Montgomery App. No. 21133, 2006-Ohio-2127, 2006 WL 1132387.

{¶ 26} 2006-1122. State v. Ward, 166 Ohio App.3d 188, 2006-Ohio-1407, 849 N.E.2d 1076.

{¶ 27} 2006-1592. State v. Wagoner, Montgomery App. No. 21225, 2006-Ohio-3760, 2006 WL 2044173.

{¶ 28} 2006-1859. State v. Newman, Montgomery App. No. 21264, 2006-Ohio-4160, 2006 WL 2336626.

IV

{¶ 29} The certified conflicts in the, following cases are answered by the opinion and the judgments of the courts of appeals are reversed:

{¶ 30} 2006-1130. State v. McKinley, Logan App. No. 8-05-14, 2006-Ohio-2507, 2006 WL 1381635. Cupp, J., not participating.

{¶ 31} 2006-1216. State v. Shaffer, Union App No. 14-45-55, 2006-Ohio-2662, 2006 WL 1459769.

{¶ 32} 2006-1330. State v. Logsdon, Seneca App. No. 13-05-29, 2006-Ohio-2938, 2006 WL 1585447.


Summaries of

In re Ohio Domestic-Violence

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 19, 2007
872 N.E.2d 1212 (Ohio 2007)
Case details for

In re Ohio Domestic-Violence

Case Details

Full title:IN RE OHIO DOMESTIC-VIOLENCE STATUTE CASES

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Sep 19, 2007

Citations

872 N.E.2d 1212 (Ohio 2007)
872 N.E.2d 1212
2007 Ohio 4552

Citing Cases

State v. Logsdon

The remaining assignments of error were not addressed. The matter was appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court and…

State v. Logsdon

The remaining assignments of error were not addressed. The matter was appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court and…