From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ohio Casualty Group

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Nov 27, 2006
No. 09-06-503 CV (Tex. App. Nov. 27, 2006)

Opinion

No. 09-06-503 CV

Opinion Delivered November 27, 2006.

Original Proceeding.

Writ Dismissed.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., GAULTNEY and KREGER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On November 15, 2006, The Ohio Casualty Group filed a petition for writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to vacate its order appointing an umpire. We requested a response from the real party in interest. On November 22, 2006, the real party in interest notified the Court that the issues presented in the petition for writ of mandamus are moot because the parties have entered into a Rule 11 agreement which includes a withdrawal of the petition for writ of mandamus. The Rule 11 agreement is attached to the response.

Accordingly, the stay order entered November 16, 2006 is vacated and this original proceeding is dismissed without reference to the merits and without prejudice to refiling.


Summaries of

In re Ohio Casualty Group

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Nov 27, 2006
No. 09-06-503 CV (Tex. App. Nov. 27, 2006)
Case details for

In re Ohio Casualty Group

Case Details

Full title:IN RE THE OHIO CASUALTY GROUP

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Nov 27, 2006

Citations

No. 09-06-503 CV (Tex. App. Nov. 27, 2006)