From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Standley v. New York State Division of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 8, 2006
30 A.D.3d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

99252.

June 8, 2006.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Connor, J.), entered October 17, 2005 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner's request for parole release.

John Standley, Comstock, appellant pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Patrick Barnett-Mulligan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur.


Petitioner is currently serving a term of 20 years to life in prison upon his conviction of murder in the second degree. At his first appearance before the Board of Parole in July 2003, his request for parole was denied, but he successfully challenged the denial and was granted a de novo hearing in July 2004. Following the July 2004 de novo hearing, which resulted in another denial, petitioner again successfully challenged this decision and a second de novo hearing was held in January 2005. At the conclusion of the January 2005 de novo hearing, petitioner's request for parole was again denied. The decision was made retroactive to July 2003 and petitioner was ordered to reappear before the Board in July 2005. Prior to the resolution of his administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the decision rendered after the January 2005 de novo hearing. Supreme Court dismissed the petition as moot and petitioner now appeals.

We affirm. Given petitioner's reappearance before the Board for another parole hearing in July 2005, we agree with Supreme Court that the matter is now moot ( see Matter of Rivera v. New York State Div. of Parole, 23 AD3d 863, 864, lv denied 6 NY3d 709; Matter of Almonte v. New York State Div. of Parole, 2 AD3d 1239, 1240, lv dismissed 2 NY3d 758). Accordingly, the petition was properly dismissed.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Standley v. New York State Division of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 8, 2006
30 A.D.3d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Standley v. New York State Division of Parole

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN STANDLEY, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 8, 2006

Citations

30 A.D.3d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 4487
815 N.Y.S.2d 492

Citing Cases

Standley v. Dennison

Standley v. Parole, Index No. 001989/2006 (N.Y.S. Sup. Ct., Albany County) (Article 78 proceeding).See…

Desanges v. All Taxi, Inc.

Further, the plaintiff has not pointed to any specific provision of the contract that was allegedly breached.…