From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

La Salle v. New York State Division of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 1, 2006
30 A.D.3d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

97844, 99285.

June 1, 2006.

Appeals (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Bradley, J.), entered March 7, 2005 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner's request for parole release, and (2) from an order of said court, entered November 16, 2005 in Albany County, which denied petitioner's motion for reconsideration.

Samuel La Salle, Stormville, appellant pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur.


In 1980, petitioner was convicted of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree after he fatally shot his estranged wife. He was sentenced, respectively, to 20 years to life and 5 to 15 years in prison. In March 2004, he made his fourth appearance before the Board of Parole for parole release. His request was denied following a hearing and he was ordered held for an additional 24 months. After the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging it. Following joinder of issue, Supreme Court dismissed the petition. Petitioner subsequently moved pursuant to CPLR 2221 for reargument and/or renewal, and Supreme Court denied the motion. Petitioner now appeals.

This Court has been advised that petitioner reappeared before the Board on April 25, 2006 at which time his request for parole release was denied. In view of this, his appeals from the judgment dismissing the petition and his order denying his motion for reconsideration must be dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Rivera v. Travis, 8 AD3d 716, 716-717). We are unpersuaded by petitioner's assertion that this matter presents an exception to the mootness doctrine ( see Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715).

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

La Salle v. New York State Division of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 1, 2006
30 A.D.3d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

La Salle v. New York State Division of Parole

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SAMUEL LA SALLE, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 1, 2006

Citations

30 A.D.3d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 4202
815 N.Y.S.2d 783

Citing Cases

Latham v. New York State Division of Parole

In view of this, the appeal is moot and must be dismissed ( see Matter of Rivers v New York State Bd. of…

In re Davidson

This Court has been advised by the Attorney General that petitioner reappeared before the Board in May 2009,…