From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re of Faulkner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 26, 2006
25 A.D.3d 1047 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

98055.

January 26, 2006.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Board of Parole revoking petitioner's parole.

Derrick Faulkner, New York City, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Spain, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.


In April 2002, petitioner was released to parole supervision, a condition of which was that he not violate the law or behave in a manner that threatens the safety or well-being of himself or others. In February 2004, petitioner was charged with violating this condition after he was caught leaving a Home Depot store with merchandise he had not paid for. Following a final revocation hearing, he was found guilty of the charges, his parole was revoked and he was placed on a 12-month hold. The determination was upheld on administrative appeal, resulting in this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

Initially, we note that our review of the determination at issue "is limited to an examination of the record to ascertain whether there exists substantial evidence to support it" ( Matter of Bratton v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 23 AD3d 879, 879; see Matter of Brew v. New York State Div. of Parole, 22 AD3d 930, 930). The loss prevention specialist of the Home Depot store testified at the final revocation hearing that he witnessed petitioner conceal items in a box on his cart and check out without paying for them. He stated that he confronted petitioner after petitioner passed the guards and was exiting the store. In our view, this testimony amply supports the administrative determination. Petitioner's testimony that he was away from his cart during checkout and thought the cashier had charged him for the items presented a credibility issue for the Board of Parole to resolve ( see Matter of Williams v. New York State Div. of Parole, 23 AD3d 800, 800-801). We have considered petitioner's other contentions and find them to be unavailing.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In re of Faulkner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 26, 2006
25 A.D.3d 1047 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In re of Faulkner

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DERRICK FAULKNER, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 26, 2006

Citations

25 A.D.3d 1047 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 422
809 N.Y.S.2d 597

Citing Cases

Santiago v. Dennison

This proceeding ensued. We turn first to petitioner's argument that there was not sufficient evidence to…

Nieblas v. New York State Board of Parole

Nor do we find, under the circumstances presented here, any error with regard to the admission of certain…