From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 12, 2006
25 A.D.3d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

January 12, 2006.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1990, was suspended by this Court's order dated June 7, 1999 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a ( 262 AD2d 702).

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner.

Janice M. Bishop, Weston, Massachusetts, respondent pro se.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur.


Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts ( see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent's application.

Respondent's application is granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Ordered that respondent's application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.


Summaries of

In re of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 12, 2006
25 A.D.3d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In re of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 12, 2006

Citations

25 A.D.3d 911 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 209
806 N.Y.S.2d 439