From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re OCZ Tech. Grp., Inc. S'holder Derivative Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 25, 2013
LEAD CASE NO.: C-12-05556-RS (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)

Opinion

LEAD CASE NO.: C-12-05556-RS C/w No. C-12-06058-RS C/w No. C-12-06343-RS

03-25-2013

IN RE OCZ TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS

BORIS FELDMAN, State Bar No. 128838 CAZ HASHEMI, State Bar No. 210239 DIANE M. WALTERS, State Bar No. 148136 NAIRA DER KIUREGHIAN, State Bar No. 282391 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation Attorneys for Defendants Adam J. Epstein, Richard L. Hunter, Russell J. Knittel, Ralph H. Schmitt, and Nominal Defendant OCZ Technology Group, Inc. Norman J. Blears Attorneys for Arthur F. Knapp, Jr. ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP TRAVIS E. DOWNS III Travis E. Downs III ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP SHAWN A. WILLIAMS George Aguilar Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs


BORIS FELDMAN, State Bar No. 128838
CAZ HASHEMI, State Bar No. 210239
DIANE M. WALTERS, State Bar No. 148136
NAIRA DER KIUREGHIAN, State Bar No. 282391
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
Attorneys for Defendants
Adam J. Epstein, Richard L. Hunter,
Russell J. Knittel, Ralph H. Schmitt, and
Nominal Defendant OCZ Technology Group,
Inc.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION

OF TIME TO RESPOND TO

CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDER

DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT


JUDGE: Hon. Richard Seeborg

WHEREAS, on February 13, 2013, plaintiffs Ian Cassiman, Clair Vanderschaaf, and Robert L. Morton filed a Verified Consolidated Shareholder Derivative Complaint (the "Complaint") in the above-captioned action;

WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation and order entered on February 1, 2013, the deadline for defendants Adam J. Epstein, Richard L. Hunter, Arthur F. Knapp, Jr., Russell J. Knittel, Ralph H. Schmitt, and nominal defendant OCZ to respond to the Complaint is April 1, 2013;

WHEREAS, defendants have requested that the deadline to respond be extended until April 22, 2013, and plaintiffs have agreed to the requested extension;

WHEREAS, the requested extension is not for the purpose of delay and will not prejudice any party;

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, subject to Court approval, as follows:

1. Defendants shall have until April 22, 2013 to respond to the Complaint.

Respectfully submitted,

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Professional Corporation

By: ___________________________

Diane M. Walters

dwalters@wsgr.com

650 Page Mill Road

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050

Telephone: (650) 493-9300

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100

Attorneys for Defendants Adam J. Epstein,

Richard L. Hunter, Russell J. Knittel, and

Ralph H. Schmitt and Nominal Defendant OCZ

Technology Group, Inc.

HOGAN LOVELLS LLP

By: _________________________

Norman J. Blears

Attorneys for Arthur F. Knapp, Jr.

IRELL & MANELLA LLP

By: ________________________

Daniel P. Lefler

DLefler@irell.com

1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900

Los Angeles, CA 90067

Telephone: (310) 277-1010

Facsimile: (310) 203-7199

Attorneys for Ryan Petersen

ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN

& DOWD LLP

TRAVIS E. DOWNS III

By: ___________________________

Travis E. Downs III

ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN

& DOWD LLP

SHAWN A. WILLIAMS

ROBBINS ARROYO LLP

By: __________________________

George Aguilar

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

I, Diane M. Walters, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Norman J. Blears, Daniel P. Lefler, Travis E. Downs III, and George Aguilar have concurred in this filing.

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

Professional Corporation

By: ________________________

Diane M. Walters

dwalters@wsgr.com

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

In re OCZ Tech. Grp., Inc. S'holder Derivative Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 25, 2013
LEAD CASE NO.: C-12-05556-RS (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)
Case details for

In re OCZ Tech. Grp., Inc. S'holder Derivative Litig.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE OCZ TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION This…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 25, 2013

Citations

LEAD CASE NO.: C-12-05556-RS (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)