In re Oath of Admission to the Florida Bar

5 Citing cases

  1. Caiazza v. Marceno

    Case No: 2:18-cv-784-SPC-MRM (M.D. Fla. Feb. 5, 2021)

    This pledge was added in 2011, so maybe not everyone said those words. In re Fla. Bar, 73 So. 3d 149 (Fla. 2011). But they're still held to them.

  2. Bonafide Props. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

    198 So. 3d 694 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)   Cited 11 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Explaining the "innovative procedure" that limited liability companies use to acquire properties at foreclosure sales and how the record "never tell us the rest of the story" in those situations

    This innovative procedure pressures lawyers to “delay anyone's cause for lucre or malice.” See In re Oath of Admission to the Fla. Bar, 73 So.3d 149, 150 (Fla.2011).Second, I assume these homes are often rented to families.

  3. Properties v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

    198 So. 3d 694 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

    This innovative procedure pressures lawyers to “delay anyone's cause for lucre or malice.” See In re Oath of Admission to the Fla. Bar, 73 So.3d 149, 150 (Fla.2011).Second, I assume these homes are often rented to families.

  4. Robinson v. Robinson

    88 So. 3d 973 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

    Although it was not improper for counsel to express his disagreement with our decision, his disparaging comments regarding this court, made at a subsequent hearing below, fell far below the standards of professionalism expected of members of The Florida Bar. See, e.g., Preamble, Rules of Professional Conduct, R. Regulating Fla. Bar Ch. 4 (“A lawyer should demonstrate respect for the legal system and for those who serve it, including judges, other lawyers, and public officials.”); Oath of Admission, In re The Fla. Bar, 73 So.3d 149 (Fla.2011) (“I will maintain the respect due to courts of justice and judicial officers.”).We affirm as to the other issues raised on appeal.

  5. Robinson v. Robinson

    Case No. 5D10-2645 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Apr. 27, 2012)

    The former husband's counsel strongly disagreed with this court's entry of the stay order. Although it was not improper for counsel to express his disagreement with our decision, his disparaging comments regarding this court, made at a subsequent hearing below, fell far below the standards of professionalism expected of members of The Florida Bar. See, e.g., Preamble, Rules of Professional Conduct, R. Regulating Fla. Bar Ch. 4 ("A lawyer should demonstrate respect for the legal system and for those who serve it, including judges, other lawyers, and public officials."); Oath of Admission, In re The Fla. Bar, 73 So. 3d 149 (Fla. 2011) ("I will maintain the respect due to courts of justice and judicial officers."). We affirm as to the other issues raised on appeal.