From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Oasis Focus Fund LP

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 4, 2022
MISC. 22-mc-113 (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2022)

Opinion

MISC. 22-mc-113

05-04-2022

In re Petition of OASIS FOCUS FUND LP, Petitioner, for an Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 to Conduct Discovery for Use in a Foreign Proceeding.


[PROPOSED] ORDER AUTHORIZING DISCOVERY UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1782

Upon consideration of the Petition for an Order to Conduct Discovery for Use in a Foreign Proceeding Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 (the “Petition”) submitted by Oasis Focus Fund LP (“Petitioner” or “Oasis”) and all papers submitted in support thereof, this Court finds that (1) the statutory requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1782 are satisfied, and (2) the factors identified by the United States Supreme Court in Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc, 542 U.S. 241 (2004), also weigh in favor of granting the Petition.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

(a) The Petition is GRANTED;
(b) Petitioner is authorized to serve the subpoenas, substantially in the form annexed as Exhibits A and B to the Declaration of Minyao Wang, upon Charles Guowei Chao (“Mr. Chao”) and New Wave MMXV Limited (“New Wave” and together with Mr. Chao, “Respondents”);
(c) Each Respondent shall produce the requested documents within thirty (30) days of the service of this Order on such Respondent, or such other date as agreed between Petitioner and such Respondent.
(d) Mr. Chao shall appear for a deposition in compliance with the Subpoena on a mutually agreeable date within a reasonable time after Mr. Chao confirms in writing the final production of documents in response to the Subpoena;
(e) New Wave shall appear for a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition in compliance with the Subpoena on a mutually agreeable date within a reasonable time after New Wave confirms in writing the final production of documents in response to the Subpoena;
(f) Nothing in this Order shall preclude Respondents from seeking relief under Rule 25 and Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, if appropriate; and
(g) Until further order of this Court, Respondents shall preserve all documents, electronic or otherwise, and any evidence in their possession, custody or control that contain information potentially relevant to the subject matter of the foreign proceeding at issue in the Petition.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Oasis Focus Fund LP

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 4, 2022
MISC. 22-mc-113 (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2022)
Case details for

In re Oasis Focus Fund LP

Case Details

Full title:In re Petition of OASIS FOCUS FUND LP, Petitioner, for an Pursuant to 28…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 4, 2022

Citations

MISC. 22-mc-113 (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2022)