From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Oakley

SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
May 28, 2019
D-29 (N.J. May. 28, 2019)

Opinion

D-29 081958

05-28-2019

In the Matter of Annette Maria Oakley, An Attorney At Law (Attorney No. 002742003)


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 18-138, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule1:20-14(a)(4), Annette Maria Oakley of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2003, should be censured based on respondent's discipline by consent in Pennsylvania for unethical conduct that in New Jersey constitutes violations of RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b)(failure to communicate with client), RPC 5.5(a)(1)(unauthorized practice of law) and RPC 8.4(c)(conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Annette Maria Oakley is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

WITNESS, the Honorable Stuart Rabner, Chief Justice, at Trenton, this 28th day of May, 2019.

/s/

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT


Summaries of

In re Oakley

SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
May 28, 2019
D-29 (N.J. May. 28, 2019)
Case details for

In re Oakley

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Annette Maria Oakley, An Attorney At Law (Attorney No…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: May 28, 2019

Citations

D-29 (N.J. May. 28, 2019)